A Single Bench of Delhi High Court has held that even a draftsman can be an attesting witness, if the draftsman has signed on the Will having animus attestandi. The expression animus attestandi means that […]
Delhi High Court recently clarified the position of law in regard to creation/existence of HUF. It was held that an HUF can come into existence prior to passing of the Hindu Succession Act in the […]
The Hon’ble High Court in the case titled M/S. Kcl Ltd. Vs. Thomson Press India Ltd. RFA 1007/2017 and 1014/2017 decided on 06.12.2017, upheld the decision of the Trial Court and held that the appellant/defendant […]
Delhi High Court recently clarified the position of law in regard to creation/existence of HUF. It was held that an HUF can come into existence prior to passing of the Hindu Succession Act in the […]
The Delhi High Court in Krishan Lal vs. Union of India and Ors. decided on08.08.2017 following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Behram Tejani and Others v. Azeem Jagani (2017) […]
The Delhi High Court in Ved Prakash and Ors. vs. Niranjan Singh on 09.08.2017 stated that in order to establish claim of adverse possession, the first and basic ingredient in law is that the possession […]
Delhi High Court in the matter of Thyssen Krupp Materials Vs Steel Authority of India; FAO (OS) 150/2002 held that Section 73 of Indian Contract Act stipulates the rule of damages for breach of contract, […]
Delhi High Court held that the Court should not interfere under A. 226, with the administrator’s decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural impropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, […]
Delhi High Court in the matter of Jammu and Kashmir State Power Development Corporation Vs K J M C Global Market; FAO (OS) 263/2016 held It is now well settled that the provisions of the […]
Delhi High Court in the matter of Inderjit Mehta Vs Union of India; WP (C ) 683/2017 decided on 2nd March, 2017 held there is no vested right of a participant in a tender to […]
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in a matter explained propositions relating to comparative advertising which means “any trader is entitled to puff his own goods even though such puff as a matter of pure logic involves […]
Division Bench of Delhi High Court in the matter of HPL (India) Limited Vs. QRQ Enterprise, FAO (OS) (COMM) No. 12/2017 was considering the effect of Section 13 of Commercial Courts, Commercial division and Commercial […]