The Supreme Court held that a revision under Section 21(b) can only be filed challenging a ‘consumer dispute’ and an execution proceedings being independent proceedings, cannot be said to fall under the meaning of “consumer […]
The Bombay High Court further held that Section 35 of the Stamp Act only gives finality to the decision in regard to the admissibility of the said document in evidence, it however does not operate […]
The Supreme Court held that the Government while reconsidering the minimum wages ought not cross its jurisdiction and alter the provision of the contract between the employee and the employer. The Court further held that […]
A registered trade union which is formed for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and their employer can maintain a petition as an operational creditor on behalf of its members. The above-mentioned observation […]
The Supreme Court has observed that the suits, appeals and applications referred to in the Limitation Act, 1963 are suits, appeals and applications which are to be filed in a Court and not before a […]
The Delhi High Court observed that while deciding a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Courts should not re-assess or re-determine the evidence and interfere with the arbitral award […]
The NCDRC held that a homebuyer may approach either RERA authorities or consumer fora and none of the acts bars the jurisdiction of the other. However, both remedies cannot be pursued concurrently. The above ratio […]
The Supreme Court has observed that the protection offered to a statutory tenant by Rent Control Laws can only be overcome by following the procedure laid out in such laws. The Supreme Court delivered […]
The Supreme Court has held that the appointment of arbitrator by a person who himself is ineligible to be an arbitrator as per Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 is void ab […]
The Supreme Court has observed that mere financial assistance to buy a property cannot be the sole determinative factor/circumstance to hold the transaction as benami in nature. The Court delivered the reasoning in the […]
The Supreme Court has held that it would be necessary for the Court before considering and passing final orders on an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to await the adjudication by the […]
The Apex Court held that Judicial orders/quasi-judicial orders passed by any court/tribunal/authority deciding the lis between parties should be supported by reasoning and parties as well as appellate courts are entitled to know the reason […]