Bombay High Court
30th Aug, 2014
By the present judgment, the Bombay High Court drawn a distinction or rather clarified that cheques payable at par if gets dishonored, the complaint filed against commission of such offence punishable under Section 138 of […]
22nd Jul, 2014
Confusion between medicinal products can be life threatening and not merely inconvenient #indianlaws
Confusion between medicinal products may be life threatening, not merely inconvenient. Thus there should be as many clear indicators as possible to distinguish two medicinal products from each other.
22nd Jul, 2014
A major son of the well educated and economically sound parents can claim educational expenses from his father or mother irrespective of the fact that he has attained majority
10th Jul, 2014
The question before the Bombay High Court was whether relinqushment deed requires registration
30th Jun, 2014
An implied promise to pay inferred from an acknowledgment could not be made the basis of the suit to recover a debt barred at the time of the acknowledgment unless it is express
30th Jun, 2014
The Court’s jurisdiction to arrest a ship in an action in rem should not be exercised for the purpose of providing security of an award, which may be made in arbitration proceedings
30th May, 2014
Merely because there are allegation and counter allegation, a decree of divorce cannot follow.
30th May, 2014
Grant or refusal of an interim measure of protection by way of an ad-interim order under Section 9 of the Act is, thus, an appealable order under Section 37
21st May, 2014
Whether in view of Section 110 of the Companies Act and SEBI circular a resolution of a scheme of amalgamation can be passed by postal ballot
2nd May, 2014
On the wording of the Indian Contract Act, the Privy Council held that all contracts of minors were void and not merely voidable
3rd Feb, 2014
No recovery of tax is to be made unless the time limit for filing an appeal has expired or till the disposal of a stay application
22nd Oct, 2013
Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in exercise of Rule 24 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 (Tribunal Rules) can dismiss the appeal for non prosecution, and, second, interpreting Rule 24 of the […]