Delhi High Court
30th Oct, 2013
Merely because property in relation to which agreement was entered upon is no longer subject to any order of restrain, party seeking specific performance does not automatically becomes entitled to such relief.
20th Oct, 2013
Parties to contract relying upon their own set of agreed rules to their advantage are estopped from pleading to the contrary that the rules are inapplicable for any other purpose when such rules are themselves […]
9th Oct, 2013
In a set of writ petitions filed before the Delhi High Court, validity of Court Fee (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2012 was questioned and the same was sought to declared ultra vires and thus liable to […]
7th Oct, 2013
When borrower and the creditor choose to reduce a contract in writing as the sole evidence of terms between them, It since becoming integral part of the transaction, shall require registration under Section 17 of […]
26th Sep, 2013
Books of Accounts is not considered as a conclusive evidence to determine liability to rule out any attempt to manipulate to fix liability on someone else due to any element of self-interest and partisanship
3rd Sep, 2013
Difference between direction for investigation and further investigation under Competition Act, 2002
If Law does not permit service of notice while directing investigation by Director General under Competition Act, a need of notice cannot be pressed at the stage warranting further investigation
14th Aug, 2013
Whether there is any vested right in continuing with the employment despite the fact that contract of employment has come to an end by efflux of time
8th Aug, 2013
What can be the fate of non-compliance of a mandatory condition prescribed in the statute was the question that arose before Supreme Court for consideration
31st Jul, 2013
Issues originating from a situation where non-resident assesses during the course of their employment by foreign companies were enjoying various perquisites
19th Jul, 2013
Provisions of Section 32 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) shall prevail, except to the extent excluded, over those of the Income Tax Act.
2nd May, 2013
GULAVARI was bound to cause confusion in the mind of the consumers about the source of the rose water on account of its deceptive similarity to Dabur’s registered trade mark GULABARI
30th Apr, 2013
Delhi High Court dilutes Suraj Lamp Judgement