Supreme Court
22nd Feb, 2015
While exercising the power under Order 7 Rule 11, the Court has to read averments in the plaint as a whole to find out whether it discloses a cause of action or whether the suit […]
22nd Feb, 2015
There is a clear difference between revocation of a ‘tender’ and revocation of the ‘tender notice’. While revocation of the tender notice is the prerogative of the Corporation, revocation of the ‘tender’ could be only […]
11th Feb, 2015
When a repeal of an enactment is followed by a fresh legislation, such legislation does not affect the substantive rights of the parties on the date of suit or adjudication of suit unless such a […]
11th Feb, 2015
Electronic documents are admissible as material evidence. The computer generated electronic records in evidence are admissible at a trial if proved in the manner specified by Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
11th Feb, 2015
The amendment in Land Acquistion Act 2013 brought by the Ordinance of 2014 would not be applicable to those case the appeals were pending much prior to the ordinance. Ordinance in so far as insertion […]
11th Feb, 2015
Even if there is no specific evidence of loss suffered by the Party alleging breach, the delay caused itself can be taken to have resulted in loss including loss of interest on the capital.
1st Feb, 2015
Order of sentence in a criminal case needs due application of mind. The Court has to give attention not only to the nature of crime, prescribed sentence, mitigating and aggravating circumstances to strike just balance […]
1st Feb, 2015
An important question, amongst other, that arose before the Court was to determine as to whether BCCI is ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 and if 19 of the Constitution of India and if […]
20th Jan, 2015
Whether leave to defend in a summary suit can be granted to a Defendant unconditionally or upon such terms as may appear to the Court or Judge to be just to put the defendant on […]
19th Jan, 2015
The Court is required to go through the merits of the claim of the respective parties in proper perspective and then to record a finding regarding extent of shares received by each coparcener/co-owner keeping in […]
19th Jan, 2015
The Official Liquidator was held to be an officer of the Court and that for the purpose of discharging statutory obligations imposed under the Act, 1956, the Official Liquidator merely steps into the shoes of […]
11th Jan, 2015
The court should not substitute its own decision for the decision of an expert evaluation committee. If there is a good reason why the project should not be undertaken, then the time to object is […]